Innovation Fixer Ltd helps companies improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their innovation

Contact information

T: +44 (0) 7802 256184 
© Innovation Fixer Ltd  

Recently on the blog

Open Innovation Myth #7 - You should manage Open Innovation separately

Tue, 08/10/2010 - 12:27 -- Anonymous (not verified)

Open Innovation is different, we should keep it separate.  We don’t want Open Innovation to interfere with the real priorities.  We need to have a different structure.

Heard this before?

As I said in a previous article, no customer every buys a product based on the source of the technology that went into it.  “New, improved, developed internally……”  You just don’t hear it.  So if the customer doesn’t care, why should you?

How Open should you be with Open Innovation?

Tue, 07/27/2010 - 14:23 -- admin

Classical “Not Invented Here (NIH)” approaches are usually associated with a secretive and highly protective approach to business. Such companies are keenly aware of the risk of disclosure, the danger of handing even the most minor advantage to competitors and the personal career risk of doing something wrong. The default position is usually legally-driven, involving heavy non-disclosure agreements (NDA), concern about only reviewing non-confidential information, invalidating Intellectual Property and not letting junior people loose.



Subscribe to Innovation Fixer RSS